A theory why Prince Harry is leaving the Royal Family.

Posted by

What would cause Prince Harry to turn his back on his family and their money? Those are two different questions.

The answer to Harry’s displeasure with his family is painfully obvious. He blames them for the death of his mother Diana.

In October 2019 Prince Harry said: ” I will not be bullied into playing a game that killed my mum.” This remark was ostensibly addressed to annoying and stressful media tactics, but it goes deeper than that. After Diana and Prince Charles divorced in 1996, the Royal Family stripped Diana’s title “Her Royal Highness” from her. Prince Harry, 14 years of age, told his mother “Don’t worry, Mummy, I will give it back to you one day when I am King.” Of course, his mother was dead a year later.

One need only look at Lady Diana’s wikipedia page today to see the well-referenced conspiracy theory and investigations that surrounded her death; The gist of it being that driver Henri Paul drove at a predictably high speed to evade the paparazzi, and at some point a small white car deliberately pulled out in front of them, causing Henri to swerve and crash at the most potentially deadly spot in the Paris tunnel, directly into a column.

Dodi Fayed, who Princess Diana was seeing at the time and intended to marry, was killed in the crash as well. Dodi’s father, Mohamed, a wealthy Egyptian, made very public claims that the Royal Family had conspired to murder his son and Diana because Diana was pregnant, and they could not stand the thought of “Royal” blood being mixed with Muslim.

Prince Harry could not have avoided knowledge of these theories, investigations and intense media speculation growing up. I think he believes his family was involved in her death. None of this is breaking new ground though.

Harry and Meghan’s recent dissociation with the Royal Family very much is news however. Speculation is that it’s somehow related to Jeffrey Epstein as the Royal Family comes under increasing pressure for Prince Andrew’s association with him. There’s no evidence of any association of Prince Harry with Epstein, however. He also appears to be happily married to a beautiful wife with a young child. Further, if Harry did have a history with Epstein, it would be much more likely that he would seek shelter within the family than leave and go it alone.

And that brings us to where the real speculation begins- money. The size and source of the Royal Family’s wealth is shrouded in mystery. The same can be said of Jeffrey Epstein’s finances. In a politely worded statement on their website SussexRoyal.com, Harry and Meghan turned their back on at least part of this wealth. “In 2020, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have made the choice to transition into a new working model. As they step back as senior members of the Royal Family and no longer receive funding through the Sovereign Grant, they will become members of the Royal Family with financial independence which is something they look forward to.” They even went to the extent of publishing a flowchart of the Crown Estate’s finances, just to clear things up a little bit.

This is the part where I’ll speculate about money. First of all, I assume two things are true: that Jeffrey Epstein was associated with both Mossad and the CIA, and that 9/11 was largely an Israeli operation conducted with the aknowledge of key people in the United States. There’s plenty of information being reported recently that Epstein was associated with Mossad, and that seems to be a widely-accepted theory, if not a fact. Of course, 9/11 is still considered by most to be a largely Saudi operation. I won’t try to prove Israel’s role here; it’s too great of a tangent, but I will briefly present some compelling evidence for anyone who wishes to research the subject and demonstrate that there is substantial evidence of Israel’s role in 9/11 that goes well beyond wild speculation.

http://www.antiwar.com/rep2/MemorandumtotheCommissionandSelectCommitteesbold.pdf
http://www.antiwar.com/rep2/MemorandumtotheCommissionandSelectCommitteesbold.pdf
http://www.antiwar.com/rep2/MemorandumtotheCommissionandSelectCommitteesbold.pdf

The maps you are looking at above are overlays of Israelis who pretended to be art students and the cells of 9/11 hijackers in the United States. The cover story for this operation is that the art students were spying on the DEA to protect drug trafficking operations. The truth is that they were monitoring the hijacking cells and the FBI to make sure the 9/11 operation was not compromised, in my opinion. Israel had access to all FBI communications as reported by Carl Cameron at Fox News. The images are taken from this report developed by private interests and presented to the 9/11 Commission in “MEMORANDUM TO THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES; THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE; THE HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE; Israeli Surveillance of the Future Hijackers and FBI Suspects in the September 11 Attacks and Their Failure to Give Us Adequate Warning: The Need for a Public Inquiry; September 15, 2004.”

Back to the money. The fact that there was insider trading based on foreknowledge of events to come on 9/11 is something that the 9/11 Commission acknowledged, but just didn’t want to investigate. They probably wouldn’t have looked at it at all if there wasn’t public reporting on it as early as the first weeks after 9/11. CNN: “Central banks and supervisory bodies in New York and across Europe are conducting investigations into what one European central banker says are ever-clearer signs of market manipulation.  Germany’s central bank governor, Ernst Welteke, says there were signs of suspicious movements in oil and gold prices before the attack. Investigators in Europe are also looking at trading in insurance and airline stocks.  There are strong suspicions that British markets may have been used for transactions, says Belgian Finance Minister Didier Reynders. Sources in London say no evidence has turned up yet, although an investigation at all exchanges is being conducted.”

So you don’t have to squint your eyes too much, I’ll tell you what the 9/11 Commission said about insider trading in the footnotes on page 499 in small font. It says “A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6.”

That investor was Alvin Krongard, Executive Director of the CIA at the time, and the transaction went through Deutsche Bank.

Deutsche Bank, sound familiar?

Deutsche Bank, that paid a small fine for laundering $10 Billion out of Russia via London and New York. Deutsche Bank, that loaned Donald Trump over $1 Billion while Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s son was involved with the account. Deutsche Bank, that Donald Trump sued to not turn over his records to Congress. Deutsche Bank, that dealt in Nazi gold and helped finance Auschwitz.

Deutsche Bank, lead banker for Jeffrey Epstein. Steve Hoffenberg: “His lead bank is Deutsche Bank, Germany, that runs the lead on his financial trust company. They run the platform in the trading of the currencies for Epstein and with Epstein.”

Jeffrey Epstein, who was Chairman of Liquid Funding, Ltd., incorporated in Bermuda on October 19, 2000. Wall Street on Parade: “While the ratings agencies acknowledged that they understood the entity could issue up to $20 billion in various instruments, Fitch reported in 2006 that “Liquid Funding is capitalized with $37 million in drawn equity commitments and $63 million in undrawn equity commitments….” We have found nothing, thus far, to explain how $100 million in equity could support $20 billion in liabilities (other than possibly the fact that Deutsche Bank is still alive). It can’t be that Bear Stearns was guaranteeing the liabilities because Bear stated in a regulatory filing that ‘The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investment in this entity is approximately $5.0 million.’”

Wall Street on Parade then goes on to note “The amount of toxic debris that had parked itself in supposedly safe money market funds.” Toxic debris, right.

You wouldn’t need to be an expert in finance to make money in the financial markets if you had prior knowledge of 9/11. Anyone could predict that the stock markets would fall, oil would probably rise, etc. But there was software that did exactly that- predict movement of financial markets (among numerous other uses). It’s called PROMIS. It’s artificial intelligence predictive software. It was in the world’s financial systems since the 1980s. It would have recorded almost all financial transactions. There would have been plenty of terrorist events between then and 9/11 for the PROMIS AI software to know how financial markets would move in detailed manners. You wouldn’t need to be as obvious as Alvin “Buzzy” Krongard and buy all the puts on an airline that crashed into the World Trade Center. There would be all types of derivatives you could take a position in that wouldn’t be obvious at all. Jeffrey Epstein was supposed to be an expert at this type of thing; that’s why Bear Stearns hired him.

Deutsche Bank, that a Federal appeals court said had to turn over Donald Trump’s financial records to Congress despite Trump’s objections. So that’s what I think is going on with the Royal Family money. There’s likely to be some receipts in Trump’s Deutsche Bank financial records that are going to open up a big can of worms on the financial side of 9/11, and it’s probably going to involve people all around the world including the Royal Family. Prince Harry wants nothing to do with them after what they did to his mother. Maybe Prince Harry will be King after all, if that’s true.

END

Advertisements

One comment

Leave a Reply